Muscovites believe that the repair - it is the duty of the state: poll results

Who should pay for the repair of houses - the state or the tenants themselves? Especially this issue is relevant with respect to the old housing stock, which the former owner - the state - to transfer to new owners - the citizens as a result of privatization, the magazine notes on real estate Metrinfo.ru.

On the one hand, experts say, there is a "federal" view that the owners should contribute financially to the overhaul of its home at the level of 5% of the cost of repairs. For this purpose a specially formed Fund for reform of housing and communal services (HCS Foundation), written by a special law on its activities. Those homes whose residents have expressed willingness to collect the money allocated money from the fund housing. According to the fund, since 2008 in Russia was repaired nearly 115 000 houses (some repairs at the moment is still going on). The second direction was formed in Moscow by Yuri Luzhkov, who declined to participate in federal projects in Moscow and in the pre-crisis years has developed its own superprogrammu overhaul, according to which expected to clean up about 14 million homes. The crisis has shown that such a program the city did not pull the new city authorities, said Metrinfo.ru, look at the prospects for repair in another way: in particular, the prefect of the Central District of Sergei Baidakov in a recent interview, said: "Moscow in accordance with federal model offers a mechanism for fiscal subsidies to the owner, who decided to conduct an overhaul of your home. In the capital, it will be the first time. Today, it houses 64 expressed their willingness to share in the overhaul. The fact that people take responsibility for their homes, said the maturity of the society . The owners will pay from 5 to 25 percent of the work. The rest - at the expense of the municipal budget. This is the "first signs" the practical implementation of housing reform. " Thus, the overhaul of a small house can cost 15-20 million rubles. 5 percent of that amount - 750 000. If the house 30 apartments, it turns to 25 thousand rubles from the apartment, experts state.


"Pay for the repair it would be logical to include in the monthly zhirovki that we all get from managing companies. But the question arises - that money must somehow build up and not eaten up by inflation. How to do it - not very clear ... By the way, the owners housing in our country, the majority - about 80%. And everything goes to the fact that the idea of ​​a free repair must part forever, "said a Metrinfo.ru. magazine conducted a poll to find out how Muscovites about the prospects of paying for major repairs of their homes.

"Have you heard that the authorities want the tenants are required to pay repair?" 62% of respondents did not know about it, 38% - had heard. Who, in terms of population, should pay for major repairs - the state or the owners? 67% of respondents believe that the repairs should be made by the government and 3% are confident that this business owners, and 4% said that this duty should divide equally between the owners and the state, 26% of respondents were undecided.

The group, which advocated a "state" major repairs (67%) gave the following arguments: First, people genuinely believe that the overhaul they already pay, making the monthly rent and taxes. According to experts, such ignorance is said that people do not know where their money and what they spent. Here are their comments: "the house for 40 years, all these years, paying utility bills with the money and need to make repairs," "should take money from the rent, otherwise what are we paying?", "Pay taxes - from the money and need to repairs take, "" pay for the content of 35 homes housing, repairs did not once "," pay a lot of money, even for what you do not use. "

Townspeople also believe that the named prefect Baidakov sum - 25 thousand rubles from the apartment - it's a lot of "expensive people to pay for major repairs at home, especially if he has a lot of years," "we have old five-story building, where seniors to get money for repairs? They and on their own redecorating apartments no money! "," large sums on repairs, tenants do not assemble themselves. " In this group of respondents also claimed that the overhaul - it is the duty of the state "for this state and there - to help people," "with what it has to be at our expense," "and then what should the state do?"

Muscovites have stressed that the apartments in the property transferred is a worn-out houses, and even before the privatization of state was in no hurry to repair the house, "privatizing the old houses, unfairly," "'43 live here - there was no repair. Let ever done before for us this shift, "" moved into a house where 50-60 years did not make repairs. Then we were forced privatization. And now, worn out, we need more house and at his own expense to repair, "" very old housing stock went after privatization. "

Among the respondents, there were also those who have already made the repairs the Moscow city government, so they know firsthand what to pay for such work would be very hard, "have already made repairs to the Us were not collected. We would not have pulled that amount," "we already done free of charge. If the money collected from tenants, the repairs will not soon be held. "

The next group believes that the overhaul - it is the duty of the owners (3%). Respondents made the following points: "once privatized apartments - must themselves pay," but, interestingly, have recognized that in practice this is unrealistic because of the low income level. The next argument - the quality of repair and its timeliness: "better themselves, but qualitatively do. And the state must wait for years, but still you will not wait." Finally, people are already doing major repairs on their own: "we have a cooperative house, and so we all pay for themselves."

The third group, slightly greater than the previous (4%), believes that major repairs to be done together with the state: "a reasonable amount you can take with the owners. But the lion's share of the state should pay," "state, plus some people will pay," "50% 50% - this is true. And people are not that expensive, and maintenance free for years not to wait. "

Very similar opinion - the joint repairs were made in the group found it difficult to answer (26%), "if in good condition, it is possible and the owners pay. And if you are already falling apart - need help from the state," "need to work together, depending on the complexity of repair" , "may be feasible participation of residents, but not 100% at our expense." In this group of Muscovites are also confident that people are already making money for major repairs, paying for the receipt of death metal. Respondents who state already repaired homes, but residents did not like it, against the state of repair, but how about - do not know "what's the point in a free repair? We already have one and a half, all start to crumble, balconies cave. And for my money repairing impossible to do, it is very expensive, "" we have done for free, and after a year all fall off the beginning. "

Citizens are not yet ready to bear the full, "the burden of maintaining the property, summing up the intelligence. According to the survey, most Muscovites believe that the repair - it is the duty of the state, since it aired in its own nationals already rather worn-out housing. In this they are right, then said the same thing and the law. at the same time the owners just do not have the money to pay for the work to bring the house in order. "disappointing that a huge number of residents is confident that the overhaul has already paid. This suggests that people are not aware of what formed their housing and utility payments and how the money is spent. But while this message is understandable - of fraud in the housing and communal services and the fabulous profits of utility bosses so much we already know that the assumption that our money is going somewhere is not there, quite naturally, "- concluded the study authors.